Why did he say that there were fewer noble sons from poor families, but more prodigal sons from poor families?
" There are fewer noble sons from poor families, but more wastrels from poor families " referred to the fact that due to various unfair factors in modern society, the proportion of people from poor families who could enter senior management positions was relatively small, while there were more failures and downtrodden people among those from poor families. The "poor family" in this sentence referred to those who lacked family background and financial support, while the "noble son" referred to those who had taken up senior management positions. Due to the uneven distribution of social resources, unequal educational opportunities and other factors, people from poor families often lacked the opportunity to obtain good education and stable high-income jobs. Therefore, in modern society, the proportion of people from poor families who could go to senior management positions was relatively low. On the other hand, there were also many people from poor families who were successful and took up senior management positions. Through their own efforts and talents, they gained status and respect in society. However, because the chances of success were often unequal, some people from poor families might face greater difficulties due to the lack of family background and financial support, which led to the phenomenon of poor families losing their children. Therefore, the phrase " poor families have fewer noble sons, but more poor families have more losers " expressed that in modern society, due to various unfair factors, the chances of success and entering senior management positions were often unequal. People from poor families faced more difficulties and challenges, resulting in the phenomenon of " poor families have losers ".
