Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

I don't think so. Novels are a reflection of life, and life has both positive and negative aspects. A good novel will balance both. For instance, a story about a war will surely have negative expressions about the horror and destruction, but it might also have positive expressions about heroism and friendship. Without both, the story would be incomplete.

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

It was a widely accepted view in the news industry that ethics were more important than professional quality. News ethics referred to the norms and principles that journalists followed in news reporting, including honesty, fairness, objectively, responsibility, etc. These ethics not only helped to maintain the image of the news industry, but also guaranteed the public's trust in news information. In contrast, professional quality usually referred to the ability of journalists in terms of professional skills and knowledge. For example, a journalist with rich news experience might be better at interviewing, writing, editing, and other basic skills, but might lack relevant professional knowledge such as politics, economics, culture, and so on. Therefore, the importance of news ethics was self-evident. A journalist should always abide by ethics to ensure the fairness and objectiveness of news reports so as to enhance public trust in the news. At the same time, professional quality was also one of the necessary abilities for journalists to help them better complete the task of news reporting. In practice, news organizations usually train journalists on ethics and professional qualities to ensure the quality and fairness of news reports. Therefore, it was reasonable to argue that the ethics of journalists were more important than professional quality.

Reading gives people pleasure, gives people glory, and gives people talent. Bacon

Reality was always more real than life. We may experience many wonderful things in life, but there are also many difficulties that are difficult to overcome. In contrast, reality is more real. We can better understand our feelings and needs and better adapt to life.

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

There are many famous sayings in novels where reality is more important than ideals. Reality is cruel, but we must face it. - Stephen King, The Shawshank Redemption People always pursue their dreams instead of facing reality. - Marilyn MonroeThe Seven Year Itch Reality is the foundation of everything, and ideals are the sublimation of reality. - Ostrovsky, How Steel Was Tempered Without ideals, life is like a bunch of unlit candles that can never illuminate the dark night. - Hugo,"The World of Miserables" Reality is cruel, but we must find our way forward from reality. - Márquez, One Hundred Years of Solitude

It is a common view that creativity is more important than knowledge, but whether this view is correct or not depends on the definition of creativity and the understanding of the importance of knowledge. If we define creativity as the ability to come up with new ideas, new techniques, or new methods, then knowledge and experience are indeed very important factors that can help us learn and grow, stimulate our imagination and creativity. Many successful artists, scientists, and inventor have a wealth of knowledge and experience, but their success often comes from their creativity. However, if we define creativity as the ability to produce new, unique, and valuable ideas and works, then creativity may be more important than knowledge. This is because creativity is a creative way of thinking that allows us to break out of the norm and discover new possibilities and opportunities. Whether it was innovation, invention, art, literature, or music, creativity could bring innovation and progress to the field. Many great works and inventions were based on creativity and imagination. Therefore, we need to be clear that creativity is a comprehensive ability that includes not only imagination and creativity but also knowledge, skills and experience. Although knowledge and experience can help us better understand and apply creativity, creativity itself is the most important factor. If we can keep an open mind and actively explore new ideas and methods, we can achieve greater success and achievements.

Competition and cooperation were both important in life. There was no absolute contradiction between the two. Competition can stimulate people's creativity and innovation, and encourage people to constantly improve their abilities in their respective fields. At the same time, competition could also encourage people to learn from each other and improve together through cooperation. In the competitive modern society, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition. Cooperation allowed people to help and support each other to achieve greater success with a common goal. In teamwork, people could use their own strengths to complete a task together to achieve better results. In addition, cooperation could also promote the development and progress of society and create more value for human society. We have seen many successful examples in modern society. For example, many successful companies in the technology field relied on teamwork. In the business world, many successful companies achieved success through teamwork. In addition, many outstanding students in the field of education also achieved their goals through teamwork. Therefore, we believe that competition and cooperation are both important in life. On the road of fierce competition in life, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition; on the road of cooperation, we need to learn to cooperate and play our respective advantages to complete a task together to achieve greater success.