The Lawsuit of Autumn Chrysanthemum, which director's work is this movie?

The film, Qiu Ju's Lawsuit, was directed by Zhang Yimou.

The ending of the movie " The Court of Autumn Chrysanthemum " was more tragic or more comedic. It was not easy to answer because the ending of the movie was decided by the director and the screenwriter. It might present different appearances according to different creative intentions and styles. From the point of view of the plot, the ending of the movie presented Qiu Ju's victory in court, but at the same time, it also showed the setbacks and difficulties she suffered in life. To a certain extent, it expressed the impermanence and unpredictability of life, so it might be considered a tragic ending. On the other hand, the ending of the movie also showed Qiu Ju's indomitable spirit and love for life in the face of difficulties. At the same time, it also conveyed hope and warmth to the audience, so it might be considered a comedy ending. The ending of the movie could be a tragedy or a comedy, depending on the development of the plot and the director's creative intentions.

The movie, The Lawsuit of Autumn Chrysanthemum, mainly tells the story of the Yongzheng period of the Qing Dynasty (1722-1735).

Qiu Ju's Lawsuit was a famous movie starred by Gong Li. It told the story of Qiu Ju's lawsuit because she was dissatisfied with her husband's inloyalty and the company's layoff policy. In the court, Qiu Ju faced a more experienced lawyer and a more powerful defendant, and finally won her rights with her wisdom and courage. The film became a classic in the history of Chinese movies with its profound social meaning and outstanding performance art.

In modern China, Qiu Ju fought for the legal rights of herself and her child in court. The story takes place in 1939 in a rural area in northern China. Qiu Ju was a hardworking and kind rural woman. Her family owed a loan shark because of gambling and was betrayed by the village chief. In order to save her family, Qiuju was forced to marry a rich and powerful man, but she did not like this man. Later, her husband owed a huge debt due to gambling and was guaranteed by the village chief. He filed a lawsuit in court and was eventually sentenced to prison. Qiu Ju's family was in trouble because of her departure. In order to regain her and her family's freedom, she went to court. In court, Qiu Ju hired an experienced lawyer and showed her strong and indomitable spirit. In the court debate, Qiu Ju used her experience and legal knowledge to prove her and her family's innocence and was finally acquitted. Qiu Ju's performance in court had won the public's respect and admiration, and she had also fought for the legal rights of herself and her family.

Li Xuelian in Fan Bingbing's version of 'The Lawsuit Against Autumn Chrysanthemum' should go to court and plead for justice. In the novel, Li Xuelian was wrongly accused and imprisoned. She filed a lawsuit with the help of a lawyer and finally obtained her innocence. Therefore, Li Xuelian should appeal to the court for justice.

The director of Qiu Ju's lawsuit was Zhang Yimou.

The director who first adapted Qiong Yao's work into a movie was the Taiwan director Yang Dechang. In 1982, Yang Dechang directed the movie One by One, which was adapted from Qiong Yao's novel, The Moon in the Twilight Dream. This was the first time Qiong Yao's work had been adapted into a movie, and it was also one of Dechang Yang's representative works.

The movie Alive uses a variety of solo instruments, including erhu, violin, banhu, flute, piano, etc. Among them, the erhu was the main solo instrument and played the touching erhu solo part of the film. The music material of the film "The Court of Autumn Chrysanthemum" comes from the folk music of northern China. It belongs to one of the operas in northern China, namely Peking opera. The Beijing opera aria in the film was sung by the famous Beijing opera actor, Zhou Xianglin.

The screenwriter of 'The Founding of a Nation' won the lawsuit against the assistant director because of the assistant director's right of signature in the movie. According to the tradition of the film industry, the rights to the screenplay were usually owned by the screenwriter, but during the filming process, the director might negotiate with the screenwriter to assign some of the rights to the assistant director or other team members. However, in this case, the screenwriter claimed that the assistant director had violated his right of authorization because the role and contribution of the assistant director in the film had not been fully reflected and recognized. The scriptwriter won the lawsuit through a lawsuit. This incident triggered legal considerations about the dispute over the film's copyright, and it also reminded the film production team to abide by relevant laws, regulations, and traditional customs in the process of film creation and respect the legitimate rights and interests of screenwriters.