Why is Douban's evaluation of the book so different from Amazon's evaluation?

The movie " Dune " was rated 7.7, 8.6, 7.9, and 7.8 on Douban. Among them, some viewers criticized the plot, background setting, and narrative method of the movie. They felt that the plot was poor, dull, and boring. The background setting did not match reality, and the audience needed to have a certain level of acceptance of sci-fi settings. However, there were also many viewers who gave the film a high evaluation, thinking that it was a sci-fi epic with gorgeous visual effects and a complicated storyline. Overall, the movie Dune received positive reviews on Douban, but there were also some negative reviews.

There were several reasons why Shrouding Heaven was highly regarded. Firstly, Shrouding Heaven had a grand setting and worldview, which was rare in Xianxia and Wuxia novels. Secondly, the characters in the novel were also very outstanding. The image of the Void Emperor and other characters was deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.  Apart from that, he had created a new cultivation system, abandoning the traditional battle energy, Nascent Soul, Soul Formation, and other elements. He had a unique cultivation method and settings. In addition, the author's writing style and profound knowledge also added to the novel's appeal. Overall, Covering the Sky had won high praise from readers for its unique worldview, wonderful plot, and in-depth character portrayals.

The audience's evaluation of " Purple River " was generally high. The audience felt that the plot design of the play was compact and full of tension, attracting their attention. The plot faithfully retained the important elements of the original work, such as the setting of the killer organization, the Purple Shirt Gang, and some important foreshadowing. In addition, the audience also praised the performance of the actors and thought that their acting skills were outstanding. The production team had invested a lot of manpower and financial resources in the production, especially in the restoration of the war scenes, which brought a visual impact to the audience. All these factors provided a good experience for the audience, which made Purple River's ratings high.

The reviews for 'Journey with the Phoenix' were mixed. Some viewers criticized the makeup and costumes in the drama, saying that they did not meet the aesthetic standards of ancient costumes. However, there were also some viewers who praised the animation special effects and funny elements. In addition, Zhao Liying and Lin Gengxin's acting skills and looks were also praised by the audience. Overall, the audience's evaluation of " Journey with the Phoenix " was divided.

"Flying Life" had a rating of 6.9 on Douban. Among them, 11.4% of the audience gave a 5-star rating, 34.8% gave a 4-star rating, 41.3% gave a 3-star rating, 10.3% gave a 2-star rating, and 2.2% gave a 1-star rating. Although the rating did not exceed 8 points, 83% of the audience still thought it was a good comedy. Overall, the audience's evaluation of " Flying Life " was relatively positive.

" Let the Bullets Fly " was a black comedy film directed by the Chinese director Jiang Wen. It told a story during the Anti-Japanese War and was starred by Ge You, Jiang Wen, Liao Fan, Zhou Yong, and other actors. The movie scored 79 points on Douban and was one of the best works in the history of Chinese movies. Many people thought that Let the Bullets Fly was an excellent film because it had profound social significance and human thinking, as well as excellent narration and performance. The film displayed a unique Chinese black humor style that made people laugh and think deeply. In addition, the plot of the movie was compact and the plot was full of ups and downs. It was a very good movie. The reason why Let the Bullets Fly received good reviews from Douban users was that it was not only an excellent movie, but also a work that could resonate with people and cause them to think.

There were a few key reasons why Dafeng Nightwatchman had such a high rating. First of all, it successfully combined the two subjects of xianxia and detective, forming a unique style of writing that attracted a large number of fans. Secondly, the novel's theme, characters, rhythm, and suspense creation had reached the professional level of the industry, bringing a high-quality reading experience to the readers. In addition, the tone of the novel was also one of the reasons why it was attractive. It was based on the investigation of the case, and the suspense was very strong. The readers were looking forward to solving the mystery and finding out the truth. The author did a good job in laying foreshadowing. The final answer was often unexpected and refreshing. In addition, the novel also filled the gaps in the detective novels of Qidian, satisfying the readers 'interest in detective novels and detective novels. In general, Dafeng Nightwatchman had met the expectations of the readers in many aspects, so it received high praise.

Douban and Zhihu's scoring mechanism might have some differences, resulting in such a big gap in the evaluation of the two platforms. Douban's rating mechanism was mainly based on the user's likes and dislikes of the work, so the level of the rating often depended on the user's opinion of the work. Douban's rating system was also affected by the author's rating. If the author gave a higher rating to his work, the rating of the work might increase accordingly. Zhihu's rating mechanism relied more on anonymous reviews from editors and readers, so the authenticity and objectively of the ratings might be higher. Zhihu's rating system was also affected by the topics that users followed, the authors, the number of comments, and other factors. Due to the different scoring mechanisms of Douban and Zhihu, there might be differences in the evaluation of the game on the two platforms.

I didn't learn anything about the title or author of Bloodthirsty God. If you can provide more information about the Bloodthirsty God, such as what kind of novel it is, which platform it is published on, etc., I will try my best to provide you with a more accurate answer.

The early reviews of "Celebrating Years 2" were mixed. Some viewers felt that the early stages of the first season were not as good as the first season. The jokes were awkward and there were too many gags and nonsense. There were also viewers who expressed that the rhythm was strange and that there were too many lame memes. However, there were also some viewers who felt that the pace was tight, relaxed, and interesting. Some netizens felt that the humor in the first film was natural, while the second film felt like it was hard for the sake of humor. Overall, Douban's early reviews of Celebrating Years 2 were inconsistent.