It's not illegal for tencent to copy it like this. It's said that it's an imitation, adding something that belongs to itself on the original basis. Guo Jingming's novel is different. This problem involved intellectual property rights and market competition. Legally, intellectual property included creativity, design, text, music, movies, and many other fields. Although it added its own elements to the original foundation, it did not completely transform the original creativity and design into its own patents or copyrights. Therefore, the actions of tencent may not be in the scope of intellectual property violation. Secondly, the protection of intellectual property rights required time. The value of intangible assets such as creativity and design was relatively low, so the law stipulated a certain period of protection. During this period, through continuous improvement and innovation, it could enhance its competitiveness and gain more market share in the market. In the end, while learning from other people's creativity and design, it was also constantly improving and innovative to transform it into its own advantages and characteristics. Although this " plagiarism " might cause controversy in some cases, it was an effective strategy from the perspective of market competition and product development. Guo Jingming's novel was different. He directly stole other people's works and adapted them into his own literary works. This kind of behavior violated copyright law and was an act of violating the intellectual property rights of others. Although Guo Jingming's novels had some influence in the market, they were banned by law because they directly stole other people's works.