In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "

The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

The advantages of reading extra-cursory books outweighed the disadvantages. Reading extra-cursory books can help people broaden their horizons, increase their knowledge, and improve their thinking and language skills. Through reading novels, history books, philosophy books and other types of extra-cursory books, people can understand different stories and characters and learn different ideas and values. This knowledge could not only enrich people's lives but also improve their overall quality. Of course, there were some negative effects of reading extra-cursory books. Some people might be so engrossed in the world of books that they neglect important things in real life. Others may be negatively affected by reading unhealthy books, resulting in physical and mental health problems. Therefore, he needed to pay attention to balance when reading extra-cursory books.

Opposite side: There is no true friendship on the Internet. Although online friendships were not as intuitive and easy to feel as face-to-face friendships, online friendships could also have real friendships. Online friendships required mutual trust and respect, as well as a willingness to maintain relative privacy and caution on the Internet. Although online communication may not be as direct and real-time as face-to-face communication, both parties can maintain contact through text, voice, video and other means to share each other's lives and emotions, which can also establish a true friendship. Online friendships could also be built on social relationships in the virtual world. Although this relationship may not be as close and deep as the friendship in real life, it can also be a real friendship because both parties can communicate, support and encourage each other in the virtual world to establish an emotional bond similar to family or friendship. Although there might be some misunderstandings, distrust, and contradictions in online friendships, this did not mean that there were no real friendships on the Internet. As long as both parties were willing to maintain caution and respect, and were willing to seek understanding and communication on the Internet, they could establish a true friendship. Therefore, we should not simply regard online friendships as a kind of "fake" friendship, but should realize that online friendships can also have real feelings and meanings.

The pros and cons of reading online novels varied from person to person, depending on one's personal preferences and purpose of reading. From the perspective of some people, reading online novels might have some benefits, such as: 1. It provides a new reading experience: There are many types of online novels with rich content, allowing readers to come into contact with novels of different styles and topics to provide a new reading experience. Satisfying reading needs: Some people may not be able to read traditional books for various reasons. Online novels can be used as an alternative way to meet their reading needs. Increase the scope of knowledge: web novels often contain some fictional worlds and plots that allow readers to come into contact with different cultures and knowledge backgrounds to increase their knowledge. However, there were some potential drawbacks to reading online novels, such as: Some people may be addicted to the plot and characters in online novels and neglect important things in real life, which will negatively affect their health. 2. Distorted values: Some web novels may have some bad values and plots that may affect the reader's values and moral values. 3. Waste of time: Reading online novels requires a certain amount of time and energy. If you over-read it, it may cause time to be wasted and affect your work and study. Therefore, reading online novels has both advantages and disadvantages. The readers should read according to their own actual situation and preferences. Pay attention to moderate reading to avoid being addicted to it.

The pros and cons of reading novels varied from person to person, but in general, there were some situations where the benefits outweighed the cons. Fictions could help people improve their imagination and creativity. Through reading novels, people could come into contact with different storylines and characters to stimulate their creativity and explore new ideas. Fictions could give people time to relax and entertain themselves. Many novels are full of tension and thrills, but reading these novels can also allow people to temporarily escape from reality and relax for a moment to relieve stress. The novel could also promote social interaction. Many novels have the author's personal experience or adaptation, which can let readers understand different story backgrounds and cultural differences, and also promote communication and interaction between readers. However, there were some negative effects of reading novels. Fictions can distract people from other important tasks. Reading novels can also be addictive, causing people to be immersed in the story for a long time and ignore important things in real life. To sum up, reading novels has both advantages and disadvantages. People should decide whether to read novels or not according to their own circumstances and needs.

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

The argument that playthings are ambitious can be based on the following points and materials: 1. The concept of "toys with ambition" means that people should appreciate and pursue the value and meaning of toys instead of just treating them as entertainment tools. This view emphasized the role of toys in developing people's personality, intelligence, and emotions. Some literary works such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins also emphasized the importance of toys in Chinese traditional culture. In these works, toys were regarded as living objects with unique value and meaning, which could cultivate people's emotions and creativity. In modern society, toys also play an increasingly important role. For example, some toys could stimulate people's creativity and imagination, develop intelligence, and promote social interaction. Some toys could also be used as souvenirs to leave good memories for people. The idea of playing with toys can also be compared with playing with toys. If a person only treated toys as entertainment tools and did not pursue the value and meaning of toys, then it was possible to lose the motivation to move forward and become lazy and passive. On the contrary, if a person could gain value and meaning from toys, stimulate creativity and imagination, then it was possible to achieve greater achievements. The above are some of the views and materials that support the plaything Shang Zhi that can be used in the debate.

The positive side believes that cooperation is better than competition because: 1. Cooperation could create greater value. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly introduce new products and improve services to attract consumers. However, if all companies adopted the same strategy, the market would become more transparent and the competition would become more intense. Cooperation could help companies find new innovation points to create more diverse products and services to better meet the needs of consumers and create greater value. Cooperation could bring more opportunities. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly expand into new markets and customer bases. However, if all companies were to explore new markets, they would face fierce competition and risks. Cooperation could help companies find more opportunities to explore new markets and customer bases by cooperating with other companies, reduce risks, and increase efficiency. 3. Cooperation could enhance the cohesiveness and competitiveness of enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly improve their competitiveness in order to gain a foothold in the market. However, if the competition between enterprises was too intense, it would easily lead to a decline in cohesion between enterprises and even lead to division and opposition. Cooperation could help enterprises build strong team cohesion, enhance cooperation and trust between enterprises, and thus improve the competitiveness of enterprises. The opposing side believes that competition is better than cooperation because: Competition can stimulate innovation and creativity in enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly introduce new products and improve services to attract consumers. However, if all companies adopted the same strategy, the market would become more transparent and the competition would become more intense. Competition could stimulate the innovation and creativity of enterprises to find new innovation points and create more diverse products and services to better meet the needs of consumers. Competition can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly improve their competitiveness in order to gain a foothold in the market. However, if all enterprises adopted the same strategy, the efficiency and effectiveness between enterprises would decline and even lead to losses. Competition can improve the efficiency and benefit of enterprises. Through the establishment and optimization of competition mechanism, it can improve the competitiveness and market share of enterprises.