Were there any cultivators in reality? Did those cultivation novels have any basis?

Definitely fictional. Vampires are a creation of imagination and folklore. There's no scientific evidence to suggest they are real. They are just part of the fantasy world we enjoy in stories.

There were Xiuzhenists in China. Xiuzhenists usually referred to people who could improve their realms and master divine powers through physical and mental cultivation. Cultivation novels, on the other hand, used the story of cultivators as the main storyline to describe their growth, the difficulties they experienced, and the goals they finally achieved. The creation of these cultivation novels was usually based on the author's personal imagination and worldview, but they could also be enriched by reading historical materials, myths, and legends. For example, some cultivation novels combined the elements of cultivators and martial arts, introducing special martial arts techniques and elements such as sect disputes. These were all extended and created on the basis of existing culture. Cultivation novels weren't created without a basis. The author constructed the story according to his own imagination and cultural background. At the same time, cultivation novels also had a certain literary value that could arouse the readers 'resonance and thoughts.

Yes. Some elements might have a basis in reality. For example, many people claim to experience strange noises or things moving on their own, which are similar to what's shown in the movie.

Dragons are definitely fiction. They're these amazing, fantastical creatures that we come across in fantasy literature and games. There's no scientific evidence or real-life sightings to suggest they're anything but made-up for entertainment and storytelling purposes.

Unicorns are just made up. They don't have any real-world counterpart. It's all in the realm of imagination and creative storytelling.

There is no scientific evidence to support catacombs ghost stories. However, some of the stories might be based on historical events that got distorted over time. For instance, if there was a tragic accident in the catacombs in the past, it could have been turned into a ghost story. But as for actual ghosts, it's highly improbable. The human mind has a tendency to create spooky stories when in an eerie environment like the catacombs.

Railway ghost stories generally don't have a basis in objective reality. They are mainly a product of human creativity and the way our minds try to make sense of the unknown or the frightening. People love to tell and hear these stories, especially in the context of railways which can be desolate and a bit eerie at times. But there's no scientific evidence to support the existence of railway ghosts.

Most celeb ghost stories are likely just unfounded rumors. There's no scientific evidence to prove that ghosts exist, let alone that they are related to celebs. People might be influenced by the fame and mystery surrounding celebs and create these spooky stories.

Most likely not. These stories are often part of local folklore and superstition. They are passed down through generations to add a sense of mystery and intrigue to the history of the railways.

Family curse stories generally lack a basis in reality. They are more like tales that are created to explain a pattern of bad luck or misfortune within a family. For example, if a family has a high incidence of a certain disease, it could be due to genetics or environmental factors, not a curse. But these stories are interesting because they reflect cultural beliefs and fears of the people who tell them. They are also a way of making sense of the unexplained and often tragic events that happen within a family.