Many people said that marriage was the grave of love, but a love that could be buried in peace was better than a corpse on the streets! Is this statement right or wrong?

Many people think that marriage and love are the grave because once married, the relationship between the two will become more intimate and may involve more responsibilities and obligations. However, if the love between the two of them could find their home in this grave, it would be better than being exposed on the streets. This sentence conveyed an important point that marriage was not the only standard to measure the quality of love. Although marriage may bring some benefits, it does not guarantee that the love between two people will last forever. On the contrary, if the love between two people can continue to maintain contact outside of marriage and can support and understand each other, then this is the most important.

This sentence expressed that marriage might make love dull or even grave, but love in the grave seemed to be more reliable than love in the street. However, this was only a metaphor and there was no definite answer. Which one was better, a love buried in the ground or a love that died on the streets, depended on one's personal values and outlook on life. Some people believe that stable marriages and long-term relationships can provide security and make people's relationships stronger. On the other hand, some people believe that love should be a passionate and romantic experience rather than a stable marriage. Therefore, there was no simple answer to this question. It had to be decided according to the specific situation and personal preferences.

This statement was not completely accurate. Marriage could provide a deeper, more stable guarantee and long-term development opportunities for love, but it was not necessarily the end of love. Love itself was a complex emotional experience that could change with the passage of time or disappear for various reasons. In the novel, marriage was sometimes an expression of love, or a way for a character to realize their dreams. However, marriage was not necessarily a necessary condition for love, nor was it the final destination of love. The characters in the novel may have other emotional connections outside of marriage or choose to live single lives to pursue their personal goals and dreams. Therefore, I believe that marriage is not the grave of love, but a way to express love and a long-term development opportunity. Of course, this does not mean that all marriages can bring true love and happiness, but it is important that we respect everyone's choice and give them the right to choose freely.

This phrase originated from many novels and movies, which expressed that marriage might weaken or terminate the promise of love. However, this was not entirely correct. Although marriage may have an impact on romantic love, it is not necessarily the grave of love. In many novels, love may eventually turn into kinship, and marriage can be a way to consolidate this relationship. In addition, marriage can bring more responsibilities and promises to love, making the relationship between the two more stable and deeper. Therefore, although marriage may weaken romantic love, it is not necessarily the grave of love but provides a more lasting and stable relationship for love.

Marriage has different meanings and functions in different cultures and societies, so there are different views on whether it is the grave or sublimation of love. In some cultures, marriage is seen as a symbol of love and a guarantee to deepen the emotional connection and mutual support between partners. In other cultures, marriage is seen more as a form of social contract or family organization than a manifestation of love. In any case, marriage as a social institution usually required the commitment and mutual willingness of both parties. Although marriage may bring some challenges and difficulties, it can also be a sublimation and embodiment of love. It can provide more stability and security for the emotional bond between partners and deepen their emotional connection. At the same time, marriage can also provide more responsibilities and obligations for the partners to promote the growth and development of both parties, and become a deeper and lasting performance of love.

Marriage is the grave of love. This saying comes from many literary works and popular culture. It is often described as the end of marriage. Love is no longer romantic and passionate, but transformed into kinship. There are many different perspectives and explanations behind this statement. Marriage requires more time and energy to take on more responsibilities and obligations, which makes love tired and difficult. Once a marriage starts, these responsibilities and obligations will become more onerous and make love more difficult. Marriage can ruin romantic and intimate relationships. Marriage requires a lot of interpersonal problems such as communication, jealousy, arguments, and a disharmonious family atmosphere. These will affect romantic and intimate relationships. Many marriages are long-term promises, meaning that both parties need to continue to pay attention and pay attention to each other in the future. However, this kind of commitment may cause the two parties to no longer pay attention to each other as they did when they were in love and gradually transform into a dull lifestyle. Some people think that marriage is a social system rather than true love. Marriage might limit the freedom and choices of both parties, making love less free and diverse. Although this statement might have some truth, it could not be generalised. Everyone had their own experiences in marriage and love. The important thing was that no matter whether the marriage ended or not, everyone should cherish and manage their love to make it deeper and better.

This statement was not correct. Marriage was not the grave of love, nor was it a place to die without a burial. Marriage could provide a deeper guarantee and continuation for love, and at the same time, it could bring more happiness and meaning. Love itself was an abstract emotion that could not be fixed or limited. It can occur between individuals, between individuals and the collective, and even at different times and places. Although marriage can strengthen love, it cannot define or replace love itself. Therefore, this statement was one-sided and inaccurate. Love and marriage are not contradictory. They can complement each other and bring more meaning and value to life.

This quote comes from the British book The Body: A Guide for Occupants, which originally reads,"A house is not a castle; it's a home And a home is not a happy place; it's a place where one's family is." The meaning of this sentence was that a house was not a castle or a place of happiness. On the contrary, home was a place where people felt warm, safe, and a sense of belonging, while marriage was a process that allowed people to establish close relationships with their families. Although this sentence was used as a humorous or ironic expression in the novel, it did express the importance and stability of marriage to love. Marriage could deepen the feelings and trust between two people, making their relationship more stable and intimate, thus providing better protection and continuous development for love. Therefore, although the phrase " marriage is the grave of love " may be interpreted as a negative point of view in some cases, it also expressed that marriage can provide long-term security and a stable relationship for love.

What this means is that although marriage may make love more profound and stable, it cannot prevent love from disappearing. In fact, what died was not love but freedom bound by love. Marriage may limit one's freedom, but love itself will not die.

One common theme is self - discovery. In these novels, the characters often have to figure out who they are outside of the wrong marriage situation. For example, they might realize their own worth and what they truly want in a relationship.