A novel that has a scientific basis but is wrong from a physical point of view is hard science fiction, soft science fiction, or fantasy?

Avatar was a sci-fi film based on modern biology and physics. It explored the story of humans entering Pandora and establishing civilization there. In the movie, there are many technological and biological differences between the creatures on Pandora and humans. These differences are very different from the biological and technological levels in our real world, so it can be considered a hard science fiction movie.

Soft science fiction focuses more on the social, cultural, and psychological aspects. For example, it might explore how a new technology affects people's relationships or the way society functions. In contrast, hard science fiction emphasizes scientific accuracy and often involves detailed explanations of scientific concepts like physics or engineering.

Science fiction in children's literature courses was usually divided into two types: hard science fiction and soft science fiction. Hard science fiction was based on scientific principles and known technological facts. It included some technological settings and worldviews that were contrary to the real world, such as time travel, aliens, superpowers, and so on. These settings needed to have a scientific basis in the novel and needed to be compared and discussed with existing science and technology. Soft science fiction novels, on the other hand, focused more on human nature, society, culture, and other aspects. Their scientific and technological settings were relatively more basic and common, such as " Milky Way Empire " and " Three-Body Problem " novels. Although the characters and technological settings in these novels were based on the real world, their emotions, values, and social systems were different from the real world, so they paid more attention to the discussion of human nature and culture. It is important to note that hard science fiction and soft science fiction are not a strict classification but a relative and subjective classification. Therefore, different readers may have different opinions on which category the same novel is classified into.

Grass novel soft science fiction is less strict about scientific accuracy. It can be more creative and imaginative in its use of science. It might use a scientific idea to drive a plot about human emotions or political situations. Whereas hard science fiction is more likely to be based on current scientific knowledge and research. It's like soft science fiction gives more room for the 'what if' scenarios in a more free - form way, while hard science fiction tries to stay closer to the known scientific realm.

Medium science fiction typically lies between hard and soft science fiction. Hard science fiction focuses a great deal on scientific accuracy and often involves complex scientific concepts like advanced physics or biology. Soft science fiction is more about the social and human aspects, with science in the background. Medium science fiction, on the other hand, balances both. It has enough scientific elements to be considered science - based but also delves into human relationships, society, and moral issues.

Soft science fiction may be more popular among those who are interested in the social and emotional impacts of fictional concepts. It can be easier to get into as it doesn't get bogged down in scientific details. However, hard science fiction has a dedicated following among science enthusiasts and those who like to think about the future of science. Overall, it's hard to say which is more popular as they both have their own niche audiences.

It depends on different audiences. Some people are really into hard science fiction because they love the exploration of real - world scientific concepts. They enjoy stories that are based on solid scientific knowledge. However, soft science fiction also has a large following. Those who are more interested in human nature and social issues might prefer soft science fiction. So, it's hard to say which one is more popular overall.

I'd say Jurassic Park leans more towards hard science fiction. It incorporates a lot of real scientific concepts and theories related to genetics and paleontology.

Star Trek is often considered a mix of both hard and soft science fiction. It has elements of advanced technology and scientific concepts that are explored in depth, but also has storylines and characters that focus more on human emotions and social issues.

Soft science fiction novels focus more on the social, cultural, and psychological aspects rather than strict scientific accuracy. For example, in a soft sci - fi novel, the time travel might not be explained in great scientific detail but rather used as a device to explore human relationships. In contrast, hard science fiction novels usually adhere closely to scientific principles and often involve detailed explanations of scientific concepts like advanced physics or biology.