This was a philosophical question that involved many fields of knowledge, including religion, science, logic, and consciousness. Different people might have different answers to this question because it depended on their definition and understanding of " reality." From a religious point of view, some beliefs believe that the world is an illusory image, not a real existence, but an illusion of consciousness. Other beliefs believed that the world was a real entity with its own nature and laws. From a scientific point of view, we currently have no evidence that the world is an illusory image or a world that is more real than the real world. The real world is made up of matter and energy, and we can observe and study it with various instruments and tools. From a logical point of view, if there was a world that was more real than the real world, then the existence of this world needed to satisfy some logical requirements. For example, it needs to have its own nature and laws, and it needs to be able to interact with our world. But so far, we have no evidence that such a world exists. This was a complicated question that had no simple answer. Different people might answer this question based on their own beliefs, knowledge, and understanding.