The world's three great novelists, Maupassant, Chekhov, and O 'Henry, each had a different ending to their novels. Ellipses describe them separately

O Henry, Chekhov, and Mo Sang were four famous short story writers in the history of Russian literature. They were famous for their humor, satire, and suspense novels. Although they were both important figures in the history of Russian literature, their styles and creative directions were different. O 'Henry's works usually had humorous, ironic, exaggerated plots and language, and were famous for their multiple endings and reversals. His novels often started with an unexpected event that triggered a series of plot climaxes, allowing readers to constantly guess the ending. It was extremely entertaining and readable. Chekhov's works, on the other hand, paid more attention to the conception of the plot and the creation of the characters, emphasizing the in-depth description of the characters 'personalities and the logical relationship between the plot and the characters. His works often had profound social and educational value, exploring the complexity of Russian society and human nature. In his works, he paid more attention to narrative skills and language arts, emphasizing the close connection between the plot, characters and nature, focusing on the discussion of the theme and the expression of meaning. His works used realism to show the French society and people's lives, which had a strong social significance and humane care. Although O'Henry, Chekhov and Maupassant were all excellent short story writers, their works had different styles and creative directions, each with their own unique charm and literary value.

Chekhov was regarded as one of the great masters in the history of Russian literature. His short story creation occupied an important position in the history of Russian literature, as famous as that of Maupassant and O'Henry. Chekhov's short stories often depicted the bottom-level characters in social life and discussed topics such as human nature, love, friendship, family, etc., which had profound ideology and unique artistic charm. His works were highly expressive and infectious. The language was concise and clear, the structure was rigorous, and the plot was full of ups and downs. They were often praised as literary classics.

His representative works included Balls of Suet, Necklace, and The Last Leaf. Chekhov's representative works included Cherry Orchard, Factory Owner, and The Man in the Sleeve. O 'Henry's representative works included "The Gift of the Magi","The Last Leaf","The Police and the Hymn", etc.

The works of maupassant, o'henry, and chekhov were all famous short stories in the history of world literature. Their works had a certain literary value and influence. The following is a comparison of their writing styles: The writing style of Maupassant is famous for its clear narration, compact plot and vivid characters. His stories were often full of social experience and philosophical thinking, while also showing the complexity and contradiction of human nature. His short stories often depicted vivid and profound characters in concise and clear language through vivid characters and plot structures. O 'Henry's writing style is featured by humor, irony and reversal. His stories were often dramatic and humorous, with ups and downs and unexpected endings. His works were full of wit and ingenious plot design that kept the readers pleasantly surprised and reminisced during the reading process. Chekhov's writing style was known for its complicated plot, numerous characters, and rigorous structure. His works usually had a profound social meaning and historical background, while also showing all aspects of Russian social life. His works are full of complicated plot structures and character relationships, making readers need to spend a certain amount of time and energy to understand and digest the content. The works of both Maupassant and O'Henry had strong narrative and plot design ability, while Chekhov's works paid more attention to the rigorous structure and complexity of the plot. Different writing styles have their own unique charms, which are worthy of our appreciation and taste.

Chekov, Tolstoy, and Dostoevsky were known as the world's three great novelists.

The three great American novelists were O 'Henry, Mauricio Mogpassant, and Leo Tolstoy.

The short stories of maupassant focused on exposing social reality and describing the characters 'personalities. They were full of drama and plot twists. They often used symbolic techniques to express the author's deep understanding of society and life. His works often depicted poverty, the weakness of human nature and the dark side of society, while at the same time showing the courage and strength of the protagonist. O 'Henry's short stories were full of humor, varied plots, and often unexpected endings. His works were mainly dramatic and comedic, often describing the weaknesses of human nature and humorous stories. Chekhov's short stories, on the other hand, focused on describing the psychological changes of the characters and shaping their personalities. The plots were compact and dramatic, and complicated plots, character relationships, symbolism, and metaphor often appeared in his works. His works were humorous, witty, and satirical, often depicting the profundity and complexity of the characters, showing the author's unique literary style and creative skills.

Maupassant, Chekhov, and O 'Henry were all famous novelists with different styles and subjects. His novels were often deeply critical of society and exploration of human nature. His representative works included Madame Bovary and Miserables. Chekov's novels focused on the complexity of the plot and structure. His representative works included the "Three-Body" series and "The Quiet Don River". O 'Henry's works often used humor, irony, and reversal. His works included David Copperfield and The New Yorker. The works of the three novelists are worth reading. You can choose one or more works according to your interests and preferences.

The representative works of the world's three kings of big and small theories, namely, Moupassant, Chekhov, and O 'Henry, were as follows: 1. Mr. Mayakovsky (1881), Miserables (1882), Crusoe (1885) 2 Chekhov: Cherry Orchard (1863), Chameleon (1867), Three Brothers (1872) 3 O 'Henry: The Last Leaf (1897), The Police and the Hymn (1902), Twenty Years Later (1904)

The three great masters of the world's short story were O'Henry, Chekhov, and Maupassant. O 'Henry was good at creating humor, wit, and suspense. He used concise and bright language to create an expressive and infectious story. He often interweaved characters and events to form a complex plot structure, allowing the reader to get an unexpected ending at the climax of the story. Chekhov's novels focused on the psychological description of the characters and the development of the characters 'personalities. He was good at portraying the characters' vivid and representative personalities so that the readers could deeply understand the inner world of the characters. On the other hand, his novels focused on the criticism and revelation of social reality. Through in-depth character description and plot design, he showed the various shortcomings of the society and the complexity of human nature at that time. At the same time, he also showed his outstanding language skills and creative talent. Therefore, all three of them had extremely high artistic value and literary appeal, becoming the treasures of the world's literary treasure house.