Chekhov, O'Henry, and what were they called?

His representative works included Balls of Suet, Necklace, and The Last Leaf. Chekhov's representative works included Cherry Orchard, Factory Owner, and The Man in the Sleeve. O 'Henry's representative works included "The Gift of the Magi","The Last Leaf","The Police and the Hymn", etc.

Mark Twain, O 'Henry, and Chekhov were all foreigners. Their works influenced the literature of a period and were considered the forerunners of modern short stories.

O Henry and K F Scott were both important novelists in the history of Russian literature and were regarded as one of the greatest novelists of the 20th century. However, their literary achievements were not directly compared because of the two. O 'Henry's short stories were famous for their humor, wit, and ingenious structure. His works often had the characteristics of reversed endings, which were very popular among readers. His representative works included The Last Leaf and The Gift of the Magi. Chekhov's novels were mainly about social life and Russian history. His works had profound social significance and historical value. His representative works included Chameleon, Carmen, and so on. Therefore, it was impossible to simply answer who had the highest literary achievements because the two had achieved outstanding achievements in different fields.

The works of maupassant, o'henry, and chekhov were all famous short stories in the history of world literature. Their works had a certain literary value and influence. The following is a comparison of their writing styles: The writing style of Maupassant is famous for its clear narration, compact plot and vivid characters. His stories were often full of social experience and philosophical thinking, while also showing the complexity and contradiction of human nature. His short stories often depicted vivid and profound characters in concise and clear language through vivid characters and plot structures. O 'Henry's writing style is featured by humor, irony and reversal. His stories were often dramatic and humorous, with ups and downs and unexpected endings. His works were full of wit and ingenious plot design that kept the readers pleasantly surprised and reminisced during the reading process. Chekhov's writing style was known for its complicated plot, numerous characters, and rigorous structure. His works usually had a profound social meaning and historical background, while also showing all aspects of Russian social life. His works are full of complicated plot structures and character relationships, making readers need to spend a certain amount of time and energy to understand and digest the content. The works of both Maupassant and O'Henry had strong narrative and plot design ability, while Chekhov's works paid more attention to the rigorous structure and complexity of the plot. Different writing styles have their own unique charms, which are worthy of our appreciation and taste.

O. Henry and Chekhov were known as the three kings of short stories in Europe. O. Henry's representative works included The Last Leaf and The Gift of the Magi, which attracted a wide range of readers with their humorous, witty, and ingenious language and plots. Chekhov's representative works include "Chameleon","Cherry Orchard" and so on. These works show the Russian society and the character of the characters, deeply reflecting the essence of social life. The title of King of Short Stories was usually given to O. Henry.

Chekhov was regarded as one of the great masters in the history of Russian literature. His short story creation occupied an important position in the history of Russian literature, as famous as that of Maupassant and O'Henry. Chekhov's short stories often depicted the bottom-level characters in social life and discussed topics such as human nature, love, friendship, family, etc., which had profound ideology and unique artistic charm. His works were highly expressive and infectious. The language was concise and clear, the structure was rigorous, and the plot was full of ups and downs. They were often praised as literary classics.

The short stories of maupassant focused on exposing social reality and describing the characters 'personalities. They were full of drama and plot twists. They often used symbolic techniques to express the author's deep understanding of society and life. His works often depicted poverty, the weakness of human nature and the dark side of society, while at the same time showing the courage and strength of the protagonist. O 'Henry's short stories were full of humor, varied plots, and often unexpected endings. His works were mainly dramatic and comedic, often describing the weaknesses of human nature and humorous stories. Chekhov's short stories, on the other hand, focused on describing the psychological changes of the characters and shaping their personalities. The plots were compact and dramatic, and complicated plots, character relationships, symbolism, and metaphor often appeared in his works. His works were humorous, witty, and satirical, often depicting the profundity and complexity of the characters, showing the author's unique literary style and creative skills.

O 'Henry's ending was known as an open-end ending. It was a writing technique that was often used by O' Henry. The ending of the story was not clearly indicated but left more room for the reader to imagine the ending of the story.

Maupassant, Chekhov, and O 'Henry were all famous novelists with different styles and subjects. His novels were often deeply critical of society and exploration of human nature. His representative works included Madame Bovary and Miserables. Chekov's novels focused on the complexity of the plot and structure. His representative works included the "Three-Body" series and "The Quiet Don River". O 'Henry's works often used humor, irony, and reversal. His works included David Copperfield and The New Yorker. The works of the three novelists are worth reading. You can choose one or more works according to your interests and preferences.

O Henry novels usually had the following characteristics: Unexpected Ending: O. Henry's novels often end with unexpected endings that confuse, surprise, or surprise the reader. 2. Multi-line development: O. Henry's novels usually involve multiple characters and plots. Some lines may appear at the beginning and end of the novel, while others will continue to develop in the middle. Humor: O. Henry's novels are usually full of humor and irony to make readers feel relaxed and happy. 4. Strong fictional nature: O. Henry's novels are usually fictional and sometimes even use fictional characters and places. 5. Endings are often open-ended: O. Henry's novels are usually open-ended, which means that readers can interpret the ending according to their own imagination and understanding. 6. Plot twists and turns: O. Henry's novels are full of drama and tension. O. Henry's novels were creative and humorous. They often attracted readers 'interest with unexpected endings, but also provided rich plots and opportunities for character development.