Was it considered copyright violation to upload an author's work online without permission?

If the novel was adapted into a script without the permission of the author and published publicly, it would be an copyright violation. Because the novel was the original intellectual property of the author, adapting it into a script without the author's permission and publishing it publicly would violate the author's copyright. Although the adaptation of the script was a new creative process, if one did not respect the original work and altered, deleted, added, or even completely abandoned it, it would also constitute copyright. In addition, if the adapted script was publicly released, they might face legal action. Therefore, when adapting a novel, the author's copyright should be respected, and the author's permission or copyright fee should be paid. Otherwise, they would be held legally responsible.

Changing his novel into a game without permission could constitute copyright violation. According to the copyright law, without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can copy, distribute, perform, show, broadcast, information network transmission, etc. to exploit the works of others. If the game was adapted from someone else's novel without the copyright owner's permission, then the game's creator could be considered to have violated copyright. Of course, there were other conditions for the establishment of copyright violation, such as reasonable use of other people's works, not to violate the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owner, etc. However, if the game adaptation violated the copyright of others, the game creator might have to bear legal responsibility. It is recommended to obtain the explicit permission of the copyright owner when using other people's works to avoid unnecessary legal risks.

If the author's name and source are not used for profit, uploading a photographic work without the author's consent may constitute copyright violation. According to the copyright law, the author enjoyed the copyright of the work, including the copyright and the right to adapt. Without the author's consent, uploading a photograph without the author's authorization may constitute an violation of the author's copyright. If the author's name and source were added, it would indicate that the uploader had the intention of deliberately violating the author's rights. Although the copyright of a photographic work was usually enjoyed by the photographer, if it was properly adapted and utilized, the work could also be classified as a work for hire, and the photographer's unit or employer would enjoy the copyright. Therefore, if the uploaded photography works were appropriately adapted and utilized, and the author's name and source were not used for profit, it might not constitute an copyright violation. However, the specific situation still needs to be judged according to the actual situation. It is recommended to obtain the author's explicit permission or authorization before uploading the photographic work to avoid possible legal risks.

If it is without the consent of others, just out of personal interest or hobby, copying other people's works without authorization may constitute copyright. This was because the act of copying violated the copyright and intellectual property of the original author. In many countries, including China's copyright law, copying a work was considered an act of copyright violation. A copy of a work referred to the act of copying, distributing, displaying, performing, or using other means to spread the original work. If you copy someone else's work without the original author's consent, it may constitute an copyright violation. In addition, the act of copying a work may also involve other legal issues such as violating the original author's portrait rights, voice rights, honor rights, etc. Therefore, it was best to obtain the original author's authorization or consent before copying other people's works to avoid possible legal risks.

It is usually considered an act of copyright violation to continue writing a novel without the author's consent. This was because the continuation of a novel was essentially an extension of the original work. If the continuation was not approved by the author of the original work, it would constitute a copyright violation of the original work. In many countries, copyright law provides that the author has exclusive control over the copyright of his work. This means that only the author has the right to modify, adapt, continue, or translate his work and must obtain the author's explicit permission. If you continue to write without the author's consent, you may face legal disputes and penalties. Therefore, continuing to write a novel required respect for the copyright of the original work and the author's permission. If you continue to write without the author's consent, it may constitute an act of copyright violation and you will have to bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

Unauthorized posting of other people's photos on the Internet usually constituted copyright. In many countries, the copyright law stipulated that without the permission of the copyright owner, it was not allowed to copy, distribute, display, perform, play, adapt, translate, etc. the works of others. If you post someone else's photo online without authorization, it may violate the copyright of the photo author. Although you might think that you posted the photos online unintentionally, it could be considered an act of copyright because you don't know if the author of the photo has authorized you to use their creation. If your actions cause damage or harm to the author of the photo, they may sue you and ask for compensation. Therefore, it is recommended to be cautious when posting other people's photos on the Internet. It is best to obtain their permission or indicate the source.

If copying someone else's work does not conform to the principle of creativity, it may constitute an copyright violation. The principle of creativity meant that only when the author independently created a brand new work could it be considered as an copyright violation. When copying someone else's work, if you only copy the elements in the work or simply imitate the style, structure, language, etc. of the work without creating a new work, then this behavior may not constitute copyright violation. However, if the main body, plot, character, and other aspects of the copied work have undergone major changes, causing the work to be fundamentally different from the original, then it may constitute an intellectual property right. Therefore, when copying other people's works, one had to be careful to avoid violating other people's intellectual property rights. If you are not sure whether it is an infringement, you should consult a legal professional.

The clashing of web novels might involve copyright issues, but it did not necessarily belong to the category of copyright violation. A clashing refers to the appearance of elements, plots, or characters from other works in a work, and these elements, plots, or characters have been widely used in other works. In this case, although it may be considered copyright violation to directly quote elements, plots, or characters from other works, if these elements, plots, or characters are widely used in the original work and are appropriately quoted by the author, it will not be considered copyright violation. For example, if the magic wand from Harry Potter appeared in a web novel, it would not be considered a copyright violation if the author of the novel appropriately quoted the magic wand in the novel. However, if the author of the novel directly copied the entire image of the wand in Harry Potter and this image was unique in Harry Potter, it might be considered copyright violation. Therefore, web novel authors had to be careful to avoid copying elements, plots, or characters from other works. When using elements, plots, or characters from other works, they had to use them appropriately and respect the copyright.

According to China's copyright law, selling, renting, transferring, or copying the copyright of an author's work without the author's written consent constituted an act of copyright violation. Therefore, if the author signed a copyright transfer agreement with the novel platform, but the platform sold the copyright without the author's consent, then the party who bought the copyright would be considered to have violated the copyright. Of course, if the author clearly expressed that he would no longer license the copyright of his work to the platform to sell, then the platform could no longer constitute an act of copyright violation. However, if the author did not explicitly express that he would no longer license the platform, he would be suspected of violating the author's copyright. In order to avoid any copyright violation, authors and novel platforms should carefully read the relevant laws and regulations when signing the copyright transfer agreement to ensure that their actions were legal and compliant.

Having someone else's name on your work with the permission of another person does not necessarily constitute an copyright violation. It depends on the method, purpose, and whether it violates the intellectual property rights of others. If the method of signing the name of another person is reasonable, such as using, paying tribute to, or borrowing from the work of another person without the explicit permission of the original author, it may constitute an copyright violation. If the purpose of signing another person's name is for promotion, publicity or commercial purposes, it may constitute an copyright violation. If you violate the intellectual property rights of others, such as copyright, trademark rights, or patents, it may constitute an intellectual property violation. Therefore, before signing someone else's name, one had to first understand the relevant laws and regulations and ensure that their actions were legal.