Would it be illegal to continue writing someone else's novel? Would it violate the copyright of the original author?
It was legal to continue writing someone else's novel if it was in accordance with the original author's wishes and authorization and did not violate the original author's copyright. However, if you modify the original content without authorization or use the original author's copyright material for commercial use, it may constitute an act of copyright violation. It was best to contact the original author to obtain authorization or obtain permission through other legal means before continuing the novel. Without authorization, the author must abide by the relevant provisions of the original author and the copyright law. The novel must not be modified, published or distributed without authorization. It should be noted that even if you were authorized to write a follow-up novel, you still had to abide by the relevant copyright protection terms. For example, the content of the follow-up novel must be the same as or similar to the original work. It must not exceed the scope of the original work, nor can it change the theme and plot of the original work. At the same time, the continuation of the novel also had to follow the wishes and style of the original author. It could not maliciously slander, tamper with, or insult the original author's work. Therefore, the continuation of the novel needed to be carefully handled to avoid violating the copyright of the original author. At the same time, it could also provide more possibilities for the creation of original literature.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
Sequel novels did not violate copyright because they were a form of doujinshi creation. Doujinshi referred to derivative works based on the original work. They could be a continuation, adaptation, translation, continuation, rewrite, and other forms of work. In this case, the author's copyright still applied to the original work and the continuation work was a legal derivative work. However, if the author used the characters, storyline, settings, and other elements of the original work in the process of writing a continuation of the novel, or maliciously tampered with or distorted the original work, then it might violate the copyright of the original work. In this case, the author who continued to write the novel had to bear the risk of copyright violation. Therefore, if you want to continue writing a novel, it's best to understand the relevant laws and regulations first to ensure that your creation conforms to the law and avoid copyright infringement.
Would writing a continuation of a novel violate copyright?
The continuation of a novel did not violate copyright, but if the content of the previous novel was re-created and published without authorization, it might violate the copyright of the author of the previous novel. This was because copyright protected the author's creativity and ideas, not the specific content of the story. If you continue to write on the basis of the previous novel and maintain the basic elements of the story structure, characters, and plot, and only use it as a source of creation, it may not violate copyright. However, if the continuation works went beyond the scope of the previous novel or greatly adapted the previous novel or used a large number of original characters and plots, it might violate copyright. Therefore, a continuation novel should be written after obtaining the authorization of the author of the previous novel to avoid possible legal risks.
Was it illegal for an author to plagiarize someone else's novel?
It was illegal for an author to plagiarize someone else's novel. Piracy violated the intellectual property rights of the original author, which was a serious copyright crime. Piracy would not only cause economic losses to the original author, but also destroy social fairness. Excellent literary works could inspire people's thinking and promote the development of the cultural industry. According to China's copyright law, it is illegal to pirate. The author should actively protect his rights and interests. If the plagiarism was serious, the original author could report it to the relevant departments and receive the corresponding punishment.
Moving someone else's video, indicating the source and author, is it an illegal act of copyright?
Moving other people's videos and indicating the source and author did not necessarily constitute an illegal act of copyright. The specifics depended on the specific situation. If the original author's authorization or acknowledgment was obtained when transporting the video, the source and author could be marked to indicate the source of the creation and respect the rights of the original author. However, if you move someone else's video without authorization or use someone else's copyright-protected content, or maliciously tamper with or distort it, it may constitute an illegal act. In addition, if the video content involves the intellectual property rights of others, such as music, text, pictures, etc., they also need to abide by the corresponding laws and regulations when transporting. Therefore, when transporting videos or other works, it was best to obtain the authorization or approval of the original author to avoid possible legal risks.
Using someone else's image as a prototype to write a novel to violate copyright?
Writing a novel based on someone else's image usually amounts to an intellectual property violation. The specific intellectual property rights that are violated may vary according to the situation. In some cases, if the inspiration for the creation comes from a publicly available literary work, movie, television series, or other form of authorized work, and only uses its characters, plot, or other elements, rather than completely copying its content, it may not be considered copyright violation. This was because the authorized works usually had clear relevant regulations that allowed them to be used within the scope of the authorization. However, creating a completely new character, plot, or world in someone else's image and using it in one's own novel could be considered an copyright violation. This is because it would constitute an unauthorized adaptation or plagiarism of the original work, which may violate the intellectual property rights of the original work. The specific situation also depended on the specific plot and situation of the novel. If you are not sure whether it is an copyright violation, you should consult a professional lawyer or intellectual property agency.
Is it illegal to continue writing web novels? Was it an copyright violation?
It depended on whether the content of the continuation was the same as the original novel or whether it violated the copyright of the original novel. If the content of the continuation was the same as the plot, character setting, story line, etc. of the original novel, and it was not authorized or approved by the author of the original novel, then it might involve the problem of copyright. In this case, the author of the original novel might sue the author for copyright violation and ask for compensation and an apology. If the content of the continuation was different from the original novel's plot, character setting, story line, etc., it was only an expansion or extension of the original novel and did not violate the copyright of the original novel, then there would be no problem of copyright violation. Of course, regardless of whether it was a continuation or other circumstances, attention should be paid to protecting the rights and interests of the original author, respecting their intellectual property rights and avoiding any acts of copyright violation. If you want to continue writing online novels, it's best to communicate with the original author to obtain authorization or recognition to avoid possible legal risks.
Would copying and selling a calligraphy work violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy work? If it was a violation, which article of the copyright law would it violate? what is the basis
The copying and selling of calligraphy works may violate the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works. The specific violation of the copyright law needs to be judged according to the specific circumstances. According to the third paragraph of article 10 of the copyright law, the right to reproduce a copy belongs to the author. Without the permission of the author, no one can create or publish a copy. If he copied the calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's right to copy. According to the first paragraph of article 2 of the copyright law, the creation of works, including modification, adaptation, translation, compilation, suppression, etc., should be negotiated and approved. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one can do this. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. According to the first paragraph of article 21 of the copyright law, the use of works by means of reproduction, distribution, rental, exhibition, performance, screening, broadcasting, information network transmission, etc. shall be negotiated and permitted. Without the permission of the copyright owner, no one shall carry out this act. If he copied a calligraphy work and sold it, it might violate the author's copyright. Whether copying calligraphy works and selling them violates the copyright of the author of the calligraphy works requires specific analysis. If any of the rights in the copyright are violated, it may constitute a copyright violation.
Would it be considered as violating someone else's copyright to publish another person's article online with the original author's name attached?
Posting someone else's article online with the original author's name did not necessarily violate the copyright of others. It depended on whether the publication was in compliance with the relevant provisions of the copyright law. According to the copyright law, without the permission of the copyright owner, no one is allowed to copy, distribute, rent, exhibit, perform, show, broadcast, information network transmission, etc. to use other people's works. If you publish someone else's article without the original author's permission, it may constitute copyright violation. However, if you add the original author's name to another person's work when you publish it online, it does not necessarily constitute copyright violation. This was because copyright law did not prohibit the act of using another person's work in good faith. As long as the original author's name was marked, it could be regarded as an act of respecting the intellectual property rights of the author. Therefore, if you add the original author's name to another person's article and mark the original author's name, it does not necessarily violate the copyright of others. However, before publishing an act, you must ensure that you have obtained the permission of the original author. Otherwise, it may constitute an act of copyright violation.
Is it illegal to copy someone else's novel?
Imitating other people's novels could be considered illegal, whether in China or abroad. This is because copyright law protects the author's creativity and creative results, prohibiting plagiarism, plagiarism, and theft of other people's works. If you copy someone else's novel without the original author's permission, you may violate their copyright. In addition, if the work was extremely similar to the original author's work or even completely copied the original author's work, it might also be considered an act of copyright violation. In many countries, copying someone else's work requires a copyright fee, which can also be considered illegal. Therefore, when writing a novel, it was best to contact the original author in advance and obtain permission or follow local copyright laws.
Was it illegal to use the name of someone else's author in one's own novel?
It was not illegal to use someone else's name in one's own novel, but one had to abide by the corresponding copyright laws and regulations. If using a name from someone else's work as the name of a character in a novel does not violate copyright, then this is only a quote and does not constitute an act of copyright violation. Of course, if you want to incorporate other people's creativity or story elements into your own novel, you need to abide by copyright laws and regulations. Unauthorized use of the names of characters or other elements in other people's works may be considered an act of copyright violation. If you have any questions about your novel, you are advised to consult the local copyright department or lawyer to ensure that your creation conforms to the relevant laws and regulations.