HeyMatt_Swag - Profile

No such thing, the protagonist is a pathetic piece of meat. Chinese chad is an oxymoron.

As other reviews have stated, it lacks allure, it was alright in the beginning, but after 50 chapters or so, it becomes a little mundane. At that point the entire premise becomes entirely unattractive. While he initially solely pursued cultivation, he quickly turns to a life of crime fighting alongside 2 other characters, they essentially string the protagonist along so that he can help them, and it seems like they stick around for some time. A dynamic that I'm frankly entirely against, hence why I won't be reading this crap any longer.

Incredibly prosaic, rampant clichés and common plot troupes. All while the author continues to plead ignorance. I don't know what's more pathetic the constant denial, or the convoluted rationalisations made in response to every critique regarding the discrepancies in the characters thoughts and actions. Then there's the startling lack of maturity, for a child plagued with debilitating illnesses, and prone to bouts of severe pain. He is... a child? I don't understand the rationale, a teen who had reincarnated with his memories and mental faculties in order, couldn't've possibly have lost all maturity in the process. The constant arousal speaks to this, yet, he acts in a manner, that although relatively more aged, doesn't come close to his actual age. When put into perspective, you essentially have a grown adult, befriending children, which is an entirely sordid prospect. When all these fools talk about character development, they seem to forget that by 19, a good deal of your mentality would've been established, which is to say certain traits and idiosyncrasies would've been established, yet these are completely neglected. It's the cherry-picking of stipulations, that allows the author to continue treading the line of utter incoherence. Nothing quite like an invigorated pedophile, to lead such a story.

Not really, he is principled, yet determined. Not entirely callous as you suggest.

It feels empty. It feels like the protagonist is maintaining a facade, as opposed to acting naturally. I also can't help but question the practicality of certain events. Posing as a khilman, a supposed battle hardened maniac, that... decided to randomly investigate the appearance of beasts? If the idea was to avoid suspicion why even think to bring up the issue at all, especially when the protagonist insists on using the area as a hunting ground? The actions are completely contradictory, then you have him perform acts of great foresight, as though he planned such intricacies. I don't want an idiotic protagonist, but making him senselessly intelligent will only question the validity of all his actions. Why doesn't he simply have a change of clothes? Why doesn't he enter and leave the town at more reasonable hours to avoid attention? Why doesn't he utilise his makeup kit to take on an appearance or conjure a back story that perhaps gives credence to his late night shenanigans. I'm sure there will be some rationale later on that will somehow justify these actions, but I can't really understand how he can appear so shortsighted.

The whole premise is ridiculous. 'Perfect character', it's an oxymoron, there's no such thing. Rather than blame it on character design, you ought to question the rationale of the character, and in the case its evidently flawed. So once more, are you stupid? The manner by which the protagonist accepts favours and repays them isn't constant, which is just poor writing, blatantly manipulating script in favour of certain outcomes. That's why I understand the anger, when Quan is helped by captain Lei, you need to understand that Lei does not actually do much in terms of help, and the whole situation was rather ridiculous, Captain Lei, allows this temporary team of his to instigate a confrontation, with literally no basis. Quan fends the attacker off, and later kills him, when captain Lei removes the body, that was by no means an extension of his hand. The food captain Lei gives to Quan on the way to the camp is perhaps the only selfless act, whether Quan followed Lei is another irrelevant matter. Because that scavenger camp in particular was no saving grace. Now Quan promptly repays him with the outcome of his introductory match against the snake. So at this point they are more or less even, the second contribution was allowing Quan to live with him, which was the largest contributor I would think. However, does that correspond to the excessive use of countless pills for Lei? No, monetarily, it does not. What about saving his life? Not even close. Then what about the complete reverence he held toward Lei, once more, for what reason? Lei had done very little thus far for Quan, on their first turbulent mission, Quan didn't underperform, in fact he exceeded his responsibilities, so captain Lei deserves no credit. Lei's only purpose in this story was to garner the protagonist's undue sympathy and attention, he was a leech, that needed to be cut off from the getgo. The whole initialization of the story at this point was blatantly ridiculous, Quan was idiotic enough, to burn corpses and gather attention, Lei respected his choice yet doesn't care enough to not let him be attacked. Then Lei just takes him under his wing. It's a sequence of confounding events made not by imperfect characters, but an obviously slow-witted author. Which when compared later on, to actual acts of selflessness toward Quan, rather than show the same reverence and care as he did to Lei, he brushes them off. I would cite the instance, but frankly these names aren't exactly memorable. The whole story is bizarre in the same sense, the character is developed and built in a certain way, yet occasionally acts entirely differently. These are not manifestations of the character but rather a moronic author. The Chinese do not excel in rational stories, every catalyst for confrontation is bizarre, and retarded, the characters are no different in that sense. You have an idiot writing stupidity, performing moronically. Your judgement that it's an imperfect character is just so shallow and thoughtless, I can't help but think you've been influenced by this story.

Are you stupid?